In many organizations, IT and business teams work toward the same goals—but operate as if they're from different planets. IT focuses on infrastructure, security, and technical precision. Business leaders prioritize speed, customer outcomes, and measurable impact. These differing perspectives often lead to misalignment—long before the first line of code is written.

It usually starts with a meeting. The business team presents a vision: “We need a unified view of customer engagement.” IT takes notes and builds a solution—only to discover weeks later that it’s missing the mark. The metrics don’t align. The dashboards don’t answer the right questions. Frustration sets in.

This disconnect isn’t new—but it’s becoming more costly. As data products grow more complex, so does the communication gap between the people who need insights, and the people who deliver them. One speaks the language of outcomes; the other speaks in schemas and pipelines.

The result? Misaligned priorities. Rework. Wasted spend. And data projects that stall or fail altogether. In this article, we’ll unpack the root of the problem—and show you how teams can bridge the divide using shared language, human-first tools, and a new mindset.

The Mars-Venus Problem in Data Collaboration

When it comes to building data products, business and IT aren’t just misaligned—they often move in parallel without ever intersecting. Requests are made. Work is done. But the collaboration that should power shared outcomes is often missing from the process.

At the root of this is a fundamental mismatch in how each side defines success:

• Business leaders measure impact through adoption, speed to insight, and strategic value.
• IT teams measure success through system performance, reliability, and long-term maintainability.

These differences don’t just show up in the final output—they shape the entire lifecycle of the data product. From requirement gathering to data modeling, from naming conventions to field logic, business and technical teams make decisions based on different mental models.

‍

For example:

• A business stakeholder may ask for a report on “engaged users,” expecting behavioral insights.
• IT may interpret that as users who log in weekly—because that’s what’s available in the event data.

‍

Neither is wrong. But without shared definitions and co-created logic, the result is misaligned with 

the original intent—and trust in the data suffers. This is the Mars–Venus problem in action: not a lack of effort, but a lack of shared understanding. Solving it requires more than better documentation—it demands a new approach to collaboration, one rooted in transparency, shared language, and real-time alignment.

Why Communication Breaks Down

The root cause of many failed data projects isn’t bad code or broken pipelines—it’s miscommunication. Specifically, the kind that stems from assumptions, silos, and misaligned terminology. When business stakeholders and IT teams aren't speaking the same language, even well-intentioned projects can quickly veer off course.

Here are three of the most common breakdowns that cause teams to talk past each other:

1. Assumed Understanding

Business users often assume their goals and terminology are universally understood. Meanwhile, IT teams interpret those same terms through a technical lens. Without clear, shared definitions, words like “revenue”, “active user”, or “lead” become moving targets.

For example, “revenue” might include recurring subscriptions for one team, and one-time purchases for another. “Active user” might be defined by logins, engagement, or transaction history—depending on who you ask. Each team builds from a different mental model, resulting in outputs that don't align with expectations.

2. Overreliance on Documentation

Many organizations rely on tickets, requirement docs, or emails to communicate data needs. While useful, these formats fall short in capturing nuance. They’re often written in isolation, lack context, and go stale the moment priorities shift. Worse, documentation tends to describe what is needed, but not why. Without that context, IT teams are left to guess the business intent—leading to solutions that technically meet the spec but miss the point.

3. Tool Fragmentation

Even when intentions are clear, tools often get in the way. Data models live in one system. Business goals live in slide decks. Glossaries are tucked away in shared drives or wiki pages no one updates. There’s no unified place for teams to collaborate around meaning—no shared canvas for defining terms, aligning on metrics, or tracing logic from idea to implementation. As a result, critical context gets lost, and decisions are made based on inconsistent interpretations of the data.

When these breakdowns compound, the result is rework, stalled timelines, and data products that no one trusts or uses. The solution isn’t just better documentation—it’s collaboration, transparency, and a shared language that’s embedded directly into the data design process.

3 Steps to Align IT and Business Around Data

Fixing this communication gap requires more than better documentation—it requires collaboration, shared modeling, and a shift in mindset.

‍

Let’s break it down:

1. Establish a Shared Language

The first and most powerful fix? Create and maintain a shared business glossary.

This living document defines key metrics, terms, and entities in plain language—so everyone, from executives to engineers, uses the same words to mean the same thing. When someone asks for “ARR,” they should be able to reference a single, clear definition that outlines:

• What it includes (new subscriptions, renewals?)
• What it excludes (discounts, churned revenue?)
• How it’s calculated
• Who owns the metric

‍

Better yet, integrate that glossary into your data design platform. Tools like Ellie.ai allow glossary terms to live alongside models and user stories—so definitions aren’t just static text, but active components in your design process.

2. Use Human-First Data Modeling

Traditional data modeling starts with tables, fields, and relationships. It’s technically correct—but functionally alien to non-technical stakeholders.

Instead, begin with conceptual data modeling: visual representations of business entities (like “Customer” or “Order”) and how they relate. No SQL. No schemas. Just shared understanding.

This model becomes the bridge between business needs and IT design. It’s where conversations happen:

• What should “active customer” mean?
• Should “region” reflect billing address or user location?
• How do we connect churn to product usage?

‍

From there, teams can layer on detail: logical attributes, physical models, deployment schemas.

Platforms that support multi-layer data modeling make this seamless allowing you to start simple and scale complexity as needed.

Tools like Ellie.ai offer shared canvases for cross-functional teams to build together—live. Think whiteboard meets ER diagram, but smarter.

3. Co-Design, Don’t Handoff

The old model was linear: Business defines. IT builds. Business tests. Repeat. The new model is collaborative: Business and IT co-design data products together—iteratively, visually, and transparently.

• Stakeholders help define entity relationships.
• Engineers flag feasibility issues early.
• Analysts prototype dashboards using shared terms.
• Data scientists build on trusted, aligned definitions.

This reduces rework, shortens time to value, and builds data products that actually get used.

With Ellie.ai’s data design platform, co-design isn’t a buzzword—it’s built-in. You can link models to business terms, comment directly on attributes, and iterate in real time.

Stop Translating, Start Collaborating 

The disconnect between IT and business isn’t just a communication issue—it’s one of alignment. When teams operate in silos, even the best data strategies can break down. Misunderstood requirements, inconsistent definitions, and isolated tools lead to costly rework and underused data products.

Bridging this gap requires a shift in mindset—from handoffs to co-creation. Successful data teams don’t just build dashboards or pipelines—they build shared understanding, cross-functional trust, and products that solve business problems.

To recap:

• Build a shared business glossary to align on terms and eliminate ambiguity.
• Use conceptual data modeling to clarify logic and connect business goals to technical design.
• Adopt a collaborative data design platform to ensure everyone can contribute, iterate, and stay aligned in real time.

Tired of building in the dark? With Ellie.ai, business and IT teams work together from day one—defining terms, modeling concepts, and designing smarter data products, faster. The most successful data teams aren’t the fastest or the flashiest—they’re the best communicators. They build shared language, shared purpose, and shared products.

‍